Le droit de l'environnement et le commerce international : quelques enjeux déterminants
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sous la pression de la mondialisation des échanges commerciaux, les tentatives d'harmonisation des normes et l'uniformisation des conditions d'exercice du commerce international ont entraîné de nombreuses modifications du droit. Ainsi, dans chacun des pays, la réglementation environnementale suit de près les orientations dès marchés et le commerce international dicte des contenus normatifs tout en exerçant une large part du contrôle de la conformité. L'étendue de cette emprise dépend, d'une part, de la portée accordée aux règles du libre-échange et, d'autre part, de l'étendue de la déréglementation environnementale en réponse aux pressions des marchés. En ce domaine, plusieurs clarifications restent à faire. Elles dépendent de l'évolution des relations entre le commerce international et la protection de l'environnement, de l'adaptation des règles commerciales au nouveau contexte international de la protection de l'environnement et des tensions qu'elles suscitent entre pays développés et pays en développement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".