MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Ability of Various Dairy Proteins to Reduce Pink Color Development in Cooked Ground Turkey Breast

2000· article· en· W2119151084 on OpenAlexaff
A.J. Slesinski, J. Claus, Christine M. Anderson‐Cook, W.E. Eigel, P.P. GRAHAM, G.E. Lenz, Robert Noble

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Food Science · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicMeat and Animal Product Quality
Canadian institutionsMaple Leaf Foods
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChicken breastFood scienceChemistryBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT: Dairy proteins were evaluated for their ability to reduce pink color in ground turkey samples. Sodium nitrite and nicotinamide were added to induce pink color formation. Nonfat dry milk (NFDM) and 1 of the whey protein concentrates (WPC) reduced CIE a* values in samples containing 10 ppm sodium nitrite. All of the dairy proteins tested reduced CIE a* values in nicotinamide‐treated samples. In samples prepared without nicotinamide or nitrite, only WPC reduced CIE a* values, while the other proteins tested had no effect or increased redness. NFDM or specific WPC proteins could be used to reduce the pink color defect and increase yield.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.929
Threshold uncertainty score0.276

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Food ScienceSame topicMeat and Animal Product QualityFrench-language works237,207