MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2119189895 · doi:10.1017/s0269964808000120

INSURANCE RISK WITH VARIABLE NUMBER OF POLICIES

2008· article· en· W2119189895 on OpenAlexaff
Ivo Adan, Vidyadhar G. Kulkarni

Bibliographic record

VenueProbability in the Engineering and Informational Sciences · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicProbability and Risk Models
Canadian institutionsSciencetech (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoisson distributionActuarial sciencePoisson processRandom variableLife insuranceInsurance policyCompound Poisson processRisk modelEconometricsBusinessEconomicsMathematicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this article we consider an insurance company selling life insurance policies. New policies are sold at random points in time, and each policy stays active for an exponential amount of time with rate μ, during which the policyholder pays premiums continuously at rate r . When the policy expires, the insurance company pays a claim of random size. The aim is to compute the probability of eventual ruin starting with a given number of policies and a given level of insurance fund. We establish the remarkable result that the ruin probability is identical to the one in the standard compound Poisson model where the insurance fund increases at constant rate r and claims occur according to a Poisson process with rate μ.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.369
Threshold uncertainty score0.246

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProbability in the Engineering and Informational SciencesSame topicProbability and Risk ModelsFrench-language works237,207