Adaptive and Cognitive UWB Radio and a Vision for Flexible Future Spectrum Management
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The continuing intense debate on introduction of ultra wideband (UWB) communications has focused on concerns about interference into and by other communication systems, and resulted in much research into how to mitigate it. Adaptive techniques to mitigate interference are summarized. The definition and use of "cognitive" and other hyperbolic and anthropomorphic terms are discussed. Developments in UWB cognitive radio (CR) to minimize interference, maximize capacity, share the radio spectrum more efficiently, and more, are summarized, and their foundations in, and linkage to, software defined radio (SDR) are noted. Motivated by measurements showing, e.g., typical spectrum utilization of about 30% below 3 GHz and 0.5% in the 3-6 GHz frequency band, CR techniques for sharing the radio spectrum by wireless systems, including UWB wireless radio, are succinctly described, and a vision for flexible, dynamic spectrum management is advanced.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".