MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2119249542 · doi:10.23919/eumc.2011.6101979

3D Ultra miniature MMIC TFMS 90° coupler fabricated with a standard air bridge process

2011· article· en· W2119249542 on OpenAlexaff
Khelifa Hettak, K. Elgaid

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave Engineering and Waveguides
Canadian institutionsCommunications Research Centre Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRat-race couplerMicrostripMonolithic microwave integrated circuitHybrid couplerAir gap (plumbing)Materials scienceOptoelectronicsElectrical engineeringElectronic engineeringPower dividers and directional couplersEngineeringComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes and demonstrates a new scheme for realizing a compact 3D 90° hybrid coupler based on compact meandered air thin-film microstrip (air TFMS) transmission line sections made using a standard air bridge multi-layer InP process. This new type of air TFMS is suspended using air bridges providing a small air gap between the signal line and ground metal. The proposed coupler takes advantage of the multi-level metallization processes offered in InP technology. The intrinsic area of the fabricated 3D hybrid coupler is significantly reduced and has shown a size reduction of 80% in circuit area at 15 GHz as compared to that of a conventional hybrid coupler using the TFMS configuration. Simulated and experimental results are presented in support of the novel 3D compact coupler

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMicrowave Engineering and Waveguides→French-language works237,207→