The Affinity Binding Sites of Pancreatic Bile Salt-Dependent Lipase in Pancreatic and Intestinal Tissues
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In previous studies, we have shown that the bile salt-dependent lipase (BSDL) associates with the Grp94 molecular chaperone, an association that appears to play essential roles in the folding of BSDL. More recently, combined biochemical and immunocytochemical investigations were carried out to show that the transport of BSDL occurs via an association with the Grp94 all along the pancreatic secretory route (ER-Golgi-granules). The Grp94-BSDL complex is secreted with the pancreatic juice into the acinar lumen and reaches the duodenal lumen, where it is internalized by enterocytes. The dissociation of the complex could take place within the endosomal compartment because BSDL continues further on its way to the basolateral membrane of the enterocyte. To localize the affinity binding sites of pancreatic BSDL in pancreatic and duodenal tissues, we have used an affinity-gold ultrastructural technique. BSDL coupled to gold particles appears to interact with specific sites in tissue sections. This was confirmed by another indirect morphological approach using biotin-labeled BSDL and streptavidin-gold complexes on tissue sections. We have shown that BSDL associates with sites in the pancreatic secretory pathway compartments and in the microvilli, the endosomal compartment, and the basolateral membrane of enterocytes. By biochemical approaches, biotin-labeled BSDL displayed affinities with proteins of 180-190 kD in both pancreatic and duodenal tissues. We have also shown that the Grp94-BSDL complexes, which are insensitive to denaturing conditions, are present in pancreatic homogenate but not in duodenal lysate. Thus, BSDL is able to bind protein complexes formed by either BSDL-Grp94 or Grp94 dimers. (J Histochem Cytochem 48:267-276, 2000)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".