MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2119254225 · doi:10.1021/jp2092994

Modeling Solvent Influence on Growth Mechanism of Nanoparticles (Au, Co) Synthesized by Surfactant Free Laser Processes

2012· article· en· W2119254225 on OpenAlexafffund
Paul D. Boyer, Michel Meunier

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry C · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLaser-Ablation Synthesis of Nanoparticles
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
FundersCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsLaser ablation synthesis in solutionNanoparticleMaterials scienceChemical engineeringColloidPulmonary surfactantAnnealing (glass)PhotochemistrySolventMicroviscosityOleylamineLaser ablationCoalescence (physics)Absorption (acoustics)Chemical physicsLaserAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Laser power scalingNanotechnologyChemistryMembraneOrganic chemistryOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Co and Au nanoparticles have been synthesized by femtosecond laser ablation and fragmentation in various liquids ( n -hexane, diethyl ether, toluene, 2-propanol, acetone, and methanol) to investigate their influences on the size of the generated particles. Results suggest that nanoparticle growth with the absence of surfactants occurs from light absorption by the colloids through diffusion coalescence and can be controlled by the solvent polarity, the processing time, and the laser power. Furthermore, the growth has been related to the electrostatic repulsion energy and to the change in the nanoparticle temperature due to the laser light absorption by using the DLVO theory. Nanosecond laser annealing of Au particles in methanol also confirms the proposed model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations48
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry CSame topicLaser-Ablation Synthesis of NanoparticlesFrench-language works237,207