MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2119299479 · doi:10.1142/s0218127406016070

BIFURCATION OF LIMIT CYCLES IN Z<sub>10</sub>-EQUIVARIANT VECTOR FIELDS OF DEGREE 9

2006· article· en· W2119299479 on OpenAlexafffund
Sharon X. Wang, Pei Yu, Jibin Li

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Science Foundation
KeywordsEquivariant mapMathematicsVector fieldPlanarHamiltonian (control theory)Hamiltonian systemBifurcationDegree (music)PolynomialMathematical analysisLimit cycleLimit (mathematics)Bifurcation theoryMathematical physicsPure mathematicsPhysicsGeometryQuantum mechanicsMathematical optimizationComputer scienceNonlinear system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we consider the weakened Hilbert's 16th problem for symmetric planar perturbed polynomial Hamiltonian systems. In particular, a perturbed Hamiltonian polynomial vector field of degree 9 is studied, and an example of Z10-equivariant planar perturbed Hamiltonian systems is constructed. With maximal number of closed orbits, it gives rise to different configurations of limit cycles. By applying the bifurcation theory of planar dynamic systems and the method of detection functions, with the aid of numerical simulations, we show that a polynomial vector field of degree 9 with Z10 symmetry can have at least 80 limit cycles, i.e. H(9) ≥ 92 - 1.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Bifurcation and ChaosSame topicAdvanced Differential Equations and Dynamical SystemsFrench-language works237,207