MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2119302857 · doi:10.1109/imtc.2006.328449

Embedded Narrow Pulse Measurement in Digital CMOS

2006· article· en· W2119302857 on OpenAlexafffund
Mona Safi-Harb, Gordon W. Roberts

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvancements in PLL and VCO Technologies
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersFonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies
KeywordsCMOSElectronic engineeringDetectorComputer scienceCapacitive sensingPulse-width modulationElectronic circuitDuty cycleDigital electronicsSampling (signal processing)Electrical engineeringPulse (music)VoltageEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper examines an embedded low-power technique for the single-shot measurement of narrow pulse signals. The circuit serves as an embedded diagnosis tool for the characterization of compressed pulses for ultra wideband sampling schemes, pulsed radar systems, measurements of clocks with very small duty cycles, single event transients in digital circuits, among many other applications. The circuit relies on a new fast voltage-crossing detector to convert a differential input pulse with width to be characterized, into same polarity edges separated by the pulse width to be measured. Those edges are then in turn stretched further using time amplification making them easily detectable by low-resolution time-to-digital converters (TDCs). Dynamic current generation techniques are used in the front-end detector to greatly reduce the power consumption. The proposed circuit is compact and introduces only a few tens of femtoFarad capacitive loading. The circuit was implemented in a 0.18-mum CMOS process. Experimental results confirm the feasibility of the proposed technique

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvancements in PLL and VCO TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207