Bibliographic record
Abstract
(See the article by Mertsola et al, on pages 656–662.) Currently, there are 2 tetanus and reduced antigen content diphtheria and acellular pertussis vaccines (Tdap vaccines; called dTpa in Europe) available for the immunization of older children, adolescents, and adults [1]. These vaccines are Boostrix produced by GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals and Adacel produced by Sanofi Pasteur. These vaccines are approved in the United States for only 1 booster dose in older children, adolescents, and adults (Boostrix for those ages 10–64 years and Adacel for those ages 11–64 years). However, because booster doses of diphtheria and tetanus toxoids are currently recommended for decennial administration, it is assumed by most pertussis vaccine and public health experts that after additional studies Tdap will be approved for routine booster doses at 10-year intervals. In this issue of Clinical Infectious Diseases, Mertsola et al [2] examine the immunogenicity and reactogenicity profile of Tdap after a second decennial dose in young adults.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.056 | 0.016 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".