MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2119318373 · doi:10.1109/cdc.2009.5400693

A necessary condition for path-finding by the homotopy continuation method

2009· article· en· W2119318373 on OpenAlexaff
Scott C. Amiss, Martin Guay

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContinuationMathematicsPath (computing)HomotopyState spaceOrdinary differential equationSpace (punctuation)Mathematical analysisState (computer science)Control theory (sociology)Applied mathematicsTopology (electrical circuits)Control (management)Pure mathematicsDifferential equationComputer scienceAlgorithmCombinatoricsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper is concerned with a path-finding method proposed by H. J. Sussmann, known as the homotopy continuation method (HCM). Given a control system initialized at some state, the HCM can be used to find an admissible open-loop control that performs a desired state transfer. This is accomplished by lifting curves in the state space of the system to curves in the space of regular admissible controls. The lifted curves are constructed as solutions of an ordinary differential equation called the path-lifting equation (PLE). The obstruction to applying the HCM, in general, is that solutions of the PLE may not be globally defined. We show that if this obstruction does not exist, then the endpoint map of the control system, restricted to the space of regular admissible controls, is necessarily a locally trivial fiber bundle. This result is valid for wide classes of control systems and controls.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.881
Threshold uncertainty score0.241

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.388
Teacher spread0.343 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Differential Equations and Dynamical SystemsFrench-language works237,207