MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2119355124 · doi:10.1109/iros.2003.1248807

Real world implementation of fuzzy anti-swing control for behavior-based intelligent crane system

2004· article· en· W2119355124 on OpenAlexaff
Jiaming Wang, Hao Li, Fakhri Karray, Otman Basir

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicDynamics and Control of Mechanical Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSwingPayload (computing)Fuzzy logicControl engineeringComputer scienceFuzzy control systemController (irrigation)Control systemScheme (mathematics)Set (abstract data type)Fuzzy setControl theory (sociology)Control (management)EngineeringArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There exist several industrial applications for large crane systems. Most of them experience serious problems with load swing. This paper presents a fuzzy based control scheme to minimize load swing for crane systems while maintaining continuous payload transportation. The control system of the crane is built using behavior-based approaches. In the control system developed, each module generates behaviors, and improvement in the performance of the system proceeds by adding new modules to the system. In order to develop the anti-swing module, fuzzy logic controller is applied using information extracted from potentiometers. The fuzzy controller provides a mechanism for dealing with imprecise sensor data. The anti-swing behaviors are successfully implemented by formulating a set of fuzzy rules. The performance of the developed system is illustrated by both simulations and experiments. The simulation and experimental results of the system show that the system remains stable under several operating situations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.660
Threshold uncertainty score0.450

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDynamics and Control of Mechanical SystemsFrench-language works237,207