MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2119361621 · doi:10.1109/scft.1993.762344

Tree-structured vector quantization of speech lsf parameters

2005· article· en· W2119361621 on OpenAlexaff
D. Chemla, Sau-Wah Soong, Wai-Yip Chan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Data Compression Techniques
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCodebookVector quantizationSpeech codingComputational complexity theoryCode-excited linear predictionAlgorithmLinear predictive codingVector sum excited linear predictionComputer scienceLinde–Buzo–Gray algorithmEncoding (memory)Coding (social sciences)MathematicsLinear predictionSpeech recognitionTree (set theory)Artificial intelligenceStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Multistage tree-structured vector quantization (MSTVQ) of speech linear prediction filter parameters is evaluated, aiming to obtain good distortion-rate performance at low en coding search complexity. For each speech analysis frame, the coefficients of the tenth order linear-prediction filter are represented as line spectral frequencies and intraframe coded using several stages of binary tree-structured VQ (TSVQ) codebooks. Experimental performance data are gathered for various degrees of codebook storage and encoding search complexity by varying respectively the number of stages and the number of encoding-search survivors. The results show that MSTVQ can furnish transparent coding quality for rates between 23-25 bits per frame. The required encoding complexity ranges from below 200 to several hundred weighted squared error distortion computations, and the required stor age complexity ranges from below 200 to about 1500 code vectors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Data Compression TechniquesFrench-language works237,207