MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2119363715 · doi:10.1109/jmems.2010.2067195

Flow Control Using a Thermally Actuated Microfluidic Relay Valve

2010· article· en· W2119363715 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Microelectromechanical Systems · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrofluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicrofluidicsFlow control (data)Valve actuatorRelayControl valvesFlow (mathematics)Lab-on-a-chipChannel (broadcasting)Materials scienceFlow control valveVolumetric flow rateChipMechanical engineeringEngineeringNanotechnologyElectrical engineeringActuatorMechanicsPhysicsTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper demonstrates a new two-stage valving concept for microfluidic systems that uses the reversible gelation of a thermally responsive polymer solution in a control channel to deflect a membrane into the main flow channel for flow control. This method can control flow through a system of microchannels using integrated electric heating elements and only one control pressure source, compared to the off-chip pressure manifold needed in existing systems. This valve technology therefore enables portable microfluidics-based diagnostic tools for biomedical applications and environmental monitoring allowing on-site analysis. Valves with zero leakage rates and a response time of about 3 s have been achieved.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.138
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it