Behaviour of reinforced concrete frames rehabilitated with concentric steel bracing
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The seismic performance of low-rise nonductile reinforced concrete (RC) buildings rehabilitated using concentric steel bracing is investigated. A three-story building was analysed using various ground motion records. The effectiveness of the steel bracing in rehabilitating the three-story building was examined. The effect of the distribution of the steel bracing along the height of the RC frames on the seismic performance of the rehabilitated building was studied. The behaviour of the nonductile RC frame members is represented using a beam-column element capable of modelling the strength softening and the effects of the axial force on the yield moment and the deformation capacities at peak strength of these members. The performance of the building is evaluated in terms of global and story drifts and damage indices. A simplified approach is proposed for selecting the proper brace distribution.Key words: reinforced concrete, frame, nonductile, rehabilitation, concentric steel brace.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it