MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2119408862 · doi:10.1560/v0m8-vjpp-6y31-bnfc

Centroid dynamics with quantum statistics

2002· article· en· W2119408862 on OpenAlexaff
Pierre–Nicholas Roy, Nicholas Blinov

Bibliographic record

VenueIsrael Journal of Chemistry · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum, superfluid, helium dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFeynman diagramCentroidStatistical physicsPhase spaceQuantumQuantum dynamicsChemistryDiagonalPath integral formulationBose–Einstein condensateQuantum mechanicsPhysicsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This paper discusses the recent developments of a new molecular dynamics approach for the study of quantum dynamics for systems obeying Bose—Einstein statistics. The formalism is based on the mapping of a quantum mechanical system onto a set of phase space variables. These phase space variables are associated with the centroid (center‐of‐mass) of a Feynman path. We present the essential features of the formalism for the representation of operators and correlation functions and discuss some aspects of its practical implementation. We also present a recently developed simplified model for superfluid environments, based on an effective centroid potential approximation to the partition function. In the context of this model, we introduce a new expression for the calculation of the condensate fraction based on the off‐diagonal one‐particle density matrix. We perform calculations for a many‐particle system where the masses and pair interactions correspond to those of helium. The results show that this simplified model exhibits Bose—Einstein condensation below a certain characteristic temperature.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIsrael Journal of ChemistrySame topicQuantum, superfluid, helium dynamicsFrench-language works237,207