Bibliographic record
Abstract
Contractile myofibroblasts are responsible for the irreversible alterations of the lung parenchyma that hallmark pulmonary fibrosis. In response to lung injury, a variety of different precursor cells can become activated to develop myofibroblast features, most notably formation of stress fibers and expression of α-smooth muscle actin. Starting as an acute and beneficial repair process, myofibroblast secretion of collagen and contraction frequently becomes excessive and persists. The result is accumulation of stiff scar tissue that obstructs and ultimately destroys lung function. In addition to being a consequence of myofibroblast activities, the stiffened tissue is also a major promoter of the myofibroblast. The mechanical properties of scarred lung and fibrotic foci promote myofibroblast contraction and differentiation. One essential element in this detrimental feed-forward loop is the mechanical activation of the profibrotic growth factor transforming growth factor-β1 from stores in the extracellular matrix. Interfering with myofibroblast contraction and integrin-mediated force transmission to latent transforming growth factor-β1 and matrix proteins are here presented as possible therapeutic strategies to halt fibrosis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".