MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2119455073 · doi:10.1109/tcapt.2005.848585

A footprint study of bond initiation in gold wire crescent bonding

2005· article· en· W2119455073 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Components and Packaging Technologies · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectronic Packaging and Soldering Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceWire bondingSubstrate (aquarium)Ultrasonic sensorWeldingFootprintBondComposite materialUltrasonic weldingMetallurgyBond energyBond strengthLayer (electronics)AdhesiveElectrical engineeringAcousticsEngineeringChemistryChipGeologyMolecule

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The morphological features of the crescent bond footprints on the substrate after peeling the wire off were studied to gain an understanding of the effect of process parameters on the crescent bond formation. In the absence of any ultrasonic energy, metallurgical bonding initiated at the peripheral regions of the crescent bond. The bond strength improved at higher substrate temperatures and higher bonding force which promoted higher shear deformation of the substrate. The application of ultrasonic energy drastically improved the growth of micro welds along the bond interface and produced micro weld patterns on the footprint that are characteristic of the level of ultrasonic energy applied. The effect of these process parameters on the mechanisms of crescent bonding are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.781
Threshold uncertainty score0.866

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it