MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2119489033 · doi:10.7202/1013187ar

Premières mentions des araignées (Araneae) Phidippus audax Hentz, 1845 (Salticidae) et Tetragnatha viridis Walckenaer, 1841 (Tetragnathidae) au Québec

2012· article· fr· W2119489033 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueLe Naturaliste canadien · 2012
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicSpider Taxonomy and Behavior Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyGeographyHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nous rapportons, pour la première fois au Québec, la présence de l’araignée sauteuse Phidippus audax Hentz, 1845 (Salticidae Blackwall, 1841) et de la tétragnathe verte Tetragnatha viridis Walckenaer, 1841 (Tetragnathidae Menge, 1866). Nous décrivons les conditions de leur découverte et commentons leur répartition. Nos observations concernant l’araignée P. audax suggèrent que cette espèce soit à la fois une espèce indigène (trouvée en milieu naturel en Mauricie et à Longueuil), mais aussi une espèce introduite comme en témoigne sa découverte dans des camions importés du Minnesota. La tétragnathe verte fut trouvée à 2 endroits éloignés (Contrecoeur et Terrebonne), dans des habitats très différents au cours des mois de juin et de septembre 2010.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.705
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it