Augmenting Detection of Prostate Cancer in Transrectal Ultrasound Images Using SVM and RF Time Series
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We propose a novel and accurate method based on ultrasound RF time series analysis and an extended version of support vector machine classification for generating probabilistic cancer maps that can augment ultrasound images of prostate and enhance the biopsy process. To form the RF time series, we record sequential ultrasound RF echoes backscattered from tissue while the imaging probe and the tissue are stationary in position. We show that RF time series acquired from agar-gelatin-based tissue mimicking phantoms, with difference only in the size of cell-mimicking microscopic glass beads, are distinguishable with statistically reliable accuracies up to 80.5%. This fact indicates that the differences in tissue microstructures affect the ultrasound RF time series features. Based on this phenomenon, in an ex vivo study involving 35 prostate specimens, we show that the features extracted from RF time series are significantly more accurate and sensitive compared to two other established categories of ultrasound-based tissue typing methods. We report an area under receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.95 in tenfold cross validation and 0.82 in leave-one-patient-out cross validation for detection of prostate cancer.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".