MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2119498348 · doi:10.1109/pac.1997.753435

High current encapsulated target system for radioisotope production

2002· article· en· W2119498348 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the 1997 Particle Accelerator Conference (Cat. No.97CH36167) · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNuclear reactor physics and engineering
Canadian institutionsTRIUMF
Fundersnot available
KeywordsModular designCoolantActuatorIrradiationMaterials scienceCurrent (fluid)Mechanical engineeringNuclear engineeringComputer scienceEngineeringElectrical engineeringPhysicsNuclear physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Solid target systems for use with vertically oriented targets are currently used at TRIUMF for radioisotope production. In order to irradiate liquids, powders, and non-electroplatable materials using the newly developed encapsulated target, a new target system for use with horizontally oriented targets is being designed. This target station has a modular assembly consisting of a landing terminal, an irradiation chamber, a manipulator, and an actuator. Targets are pneumatically transferred between the station and the hot cells. The target is positioned in the irradiation orientation by a remotely controlled actuator, which also creates concentric coolant circuit against the back surface of the target. Additional cooling is provided by a forced flow of helium gas over the top surface of the target. This target station can also be used for irradiation of regular solid targets. The paper discusses the detailed design of this target system and the current status of the project.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.525
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it