MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2119506381 · doi:10.1002/fld.591

A projection scheme for incompressible multiphase flow using adaptive Eulerian grid

2004· article· en· W2119506381 on OpenAlexaff
T. Chen, P Minev, K. Nandakumar

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicComputational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiscretizationMathematicsEulerian pathProjection methodPiecewise linear functionMesh generationCompressibilityGridProjection (relational algebra)Applied mathematicsMathematical analysisFinite element methodGeometryMathematical optimizationMechanicsAlgorithmDykstra's projection algorithmPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This paper presents a finite element method for incompressible multiphase flows with capillary interfaces based on a (formally) second‐order projection scheme. The discretization is on a fixed Eulerian grid. The fluid phases are identified and advected using a level set function. The grid is temporarily adapted around the interfaces in order to maintain optimal interpolations accounting for the pressure jump and the discontinuity of the normal velocity derivatives. The least‐squares method for computing the curvature is used, combined with piecewise linear approximation to the interface. The time integration is based on a formally second order splitting scheme. The convection substep is integrated over an Eulerian grid using an explicit scheme. The remaining generalized Stokes problem is solved by means of a formally second order pressure‐stabilized projection scheme. The pressure boundary condition on the free interface is imposed in a strong form (pointwise) at the pressure‐computation substep. This allows capturing significant pressure jumps across the interface without creating spurious instabilities. This method is simple and efficient, as demonstrated by the numerical experiments on a wide range of free‐surface problems. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.407
Teacher spread0.358 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations33
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal for Numerical Methods in FluidsSame topicComputational Fluid Dynamics and AerodynamicsFrench-language works237,207