L'invasion de l'Irak : les dessous de la prise de décision de la présidence Bush
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Résumé Dans la foulée des événements du 11 septembre, l'Administration Bush amorce une véritable révolution qui va altérer le cours de la politique étrangère américaine. L'ensemble de l'approche décisionnelle est réorienté tandis que les rivalités administratives, traditionnellement vivaces, s'atténuent considérablement. La gestion du processus décisionnel se fait moins formelle, notamment parce que le risque terroriste impose une réactivité accrue. Le « cabinet de guerre » qui se met en place réunit les principaux décideurs du Conseil de sécurité nationale (NSC) et prend une série de décisions qui vont marquer le cours des relations internationales. Dans le même temps, le processus décisionnel marqué par la guerre en Afghanistan évolue, tandis que derrière l'émergence d'une véritable pensée unique, se profile déjà l'invasion de l'Irak.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".