MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2119544044 · doi:10.1109/lsp.2002.805312

A new NLMS algorithm for slow noise magnitude variation

2002· article· en· W2119544044 on OpenAlexaff
Saeed Gazor, Kamal Shahtalebi

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Signal Processing Letters · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicControl Systems and Identification
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMagnitude (astronomy)AlgorithmNoise (video)Bounding overwatchA priori and a posterioriEllipsoidComputer scienceNoise measurementSet (abstract data type)Variation (astronomy)MathematicsArtificial intelligenceNoise reductionImage (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A set-membership (SM) normalized least-mean-square (NLMS) (SMNLMS) algorithm is developed using SM theory in the class of optimal bounding ellipsoid (OBE) algorithms. This signed version of NLMS algorithm requires a priori knowledge of a bound for the error magnitude, which is unknown in most applications. A very simple algorithm is proposed for the case in which the unknown magnitude of the measurement noise is slowly time-varying. The proposed algorithm is able to extract the noise magnitude information and exploit this magnitude to enhance or accelerate the learning process without risk of overbounding or performance loss due to underbounding. The performance of the proposed algorithm is compared with that of SMNLMS using some simulation examples.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Signal Processing LettersSame topicControl Systems and IdentificationFrench-language works237,207