PGPR mediated management of stem blight of<i>Phyllanthus amarus</i>(Schum and Thonn) caused by<i>Corynespora cassiicola</i>(Berk and Curt) Wei
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bacillus subtilis (BSCBE4), Pseudomonas chlororaphis (PA23), endophytic P. fluorescens (ENPF1) inhibited the mycelial growth of stem blight pathogen Corynespora casiicola (Berk and Curt)Wei under in vitro. All these bacterial isolates produced both hydroxamate and carboxylate type of siderophores. But the siderophore production was maximum with the isolate ENPF1. Delivering of talc based formulation of BSCBE4 through seedling dip and foliar application effectively reduced stem blight disease incidence and increased the dry matter production under pot culture and field conditions. Application of BSCBE4, PA23 and ENPF1 increased the defense related enzymes such as peroxidase, polyphenol oxidase, chitinase and β-1,3 glucanase in P. amarus up to ten days after challenge inoculation with C. cassicola. Native gel electrophoretic analysis revealed that challenge inoculation of pathogen with BSCBE4 and PA23 induced both peroxidase and polyphnol oxidase isoforms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".