Pushing the envelope: microinjection of Minute virus of mice into Xenopus oocytes causes damage to the nuclear envelope
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Parvoviruses are small DNA viruses that replicate in the nucleus of their host cells. It has been largely assumed that parvoviruses enter the nucleus through the nuclear pore complex (NPC). However, the details of this mechanism remain undefined. To study this problem, the parvovirus Minute virus of mice (MVM) was microinjected into the cytoplasm of Xenopus oocytes and a transmission electron microscope was used to visualize the effect of the virus on the host cell. It was found that MVM caused damage to the nuclear envelope (NE) in a time- and concentration-dependent manner. Damage was predominantly to the outer nuclear membrane and was often near the NPCs. However, microinjection experiments in which the NPCs were blocked showed that NE damage induced by MVM was independent of the NPC. To address the question of whether this effect of MVM is specific to the NE, purified organelles were incubated with MVM. Visualization by electron microscopy revealed that MVM did not affect all intracellular membranes. These data represent a novel form of virus-induced damage to host cell nuclear structure and suggest that MVM is imported into the nucleus using a unique mechanism that is independent of the NPC, and involves disruption of the NE and import through the resulting breaks.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".