Stimulation of brain Na<sup>+</sup>channels by FMRFamide in Dahl SS and SR rats
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Stimulation of brain Na+ channels by Phe-Met-Arg-Phe-NH2 (FMRFamide) increases sympathetic nerve activity and blood pressure (BP) in Wistar rats. Blockade of brain ouabain-like compounds (OLC) by specific antibody Fab fragments prevents these responses to intracerebroventricular FMRFamide. In the present study, we evaluated the effects of high-salt intake on brain FMRFamide levels and the responses of BP and brain OLC to intracerebroventricular infusion of FMRFamide in Dahl salt-sensitive (SS) and salt-resistant (SR) rats. FMRFamide and OLC content was measured with the use of RIA and ELISA, respectively. A high-salt diet (1,370 micromol Na+/g) for 2 wk significantly increased BP in Dahl SS but not in SR rats. On a regular salt diet, Dahl SS and SR rats showed similar FMRFamide levels in the whole hypothalamus, pons and medulla, and spinal cord. A high-salt diet for 2 wk did not affect FMRFamide levels in these tissues in both Dahl SS and SR rats. In Dahl SS but not in SR rats, chronic intracerebroventricular infusion of FMRFamide (200 nmol. kg(-1).day(-1)) for 2 wk significantly increased BP (mean arterial pressure: 116 +/- 5 vs. 100 +/- 2 mmHg; P < 0.01). Chronic intracerebroventricular infusion of FMRFamide significantly increased hypothalamic and pituitary OLC in Dahl SS but not SR rats. These results indicate that Dahl SS rats exhibit enhanced central responses to FMRFamide. In Dahl SS but not in SR rats on a high-salt diet, enhanced Na+ entry through FMRFamide-activated brain Na+ channels may increase brain OLC release, thereby leading to hypertension.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".