The Social Construction of Disaster: Ondoy (Ketsana) in the Context of Sagrada Familia and Inquirer.net
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Generally, studies on disaster in the field of social science are plain descriptions of the phenomenon and subjectsare simply regarded as victims and rescuers. It is observable that there is neglect for theory generation andmethodological expansion. These limitations serve as impetus for this research endeavor. Primarily, the aim ofthis research is to elicit theoretical and methodological contributions to the field of Sociology. In broad stroke,the inquiry centers on the social construction of disaster among the members of Sagrada Familia and Inquirer.net.This paper contends that there is an array of contexts that can essentialize the analysis of Ondoy (internationalname: Ketsana). Thus, Ondoy is not a natural phenomenon but a social construction. In conclusion, this paperhighlights its theoretical contribution to social constructivism and its implications to problem-specific,community-based and participatory approaches in community engagement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".