MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2119611931 · doi:10.25011/cim.v38i1.22574

Thyroid Stimulating Hormone Suppression Post-Therapy in Patients with Graves’ Disease: A Systematic Review of Pathophysiology and Clinical Data

2015· review· en· W2119611931 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Huan Yu, Pendar Farahani

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical and investigative medicine · 2015
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicThyroid Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePathophysiologyThyroid-stimulating hormoneInternal medicineHormoneThyroidDiseaseEndocrinologyGraves' disease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Post-treatment hypothyroidism is common in Graves' disease, and clinical guidelines recommend monitoring for it; however, thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) can remain suppressed in these patients following treatment. The objectives of this study were to explore the proposed pathophysiology behind the phenomenon of post-therapy TSH suppression and to systematically review existing clinical data on post-therapy TSH suppression in patients with Graves' disease. SOURCE: A systematic literature search was performed using EMBASE and PubMed databases, with several combinations of MeSH terms. Bibliography mining was also done on relevant articles to be as inclusive as possible. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: A total of 18 articles described possible mechanisms for post-therapy TSH suppression. Several of the studies demonstrate evidence of thyrotroph atrophy and hypothesize that this contributes to the ongoing suppression. TSH receptors have been identified in folliculo-stellate cells of the pituitary as well as astroglial cells of the hypothalamus, mediating paracrine feedback. A few studies have demonstrated inverse correlation between autoantibody titres and TSH levels, suggestive of their role in mediating ongoing TSH suppression in patients with Graves' disease. In addition, five studies were identified that provided clinical data on the duration of TSH suppression. Combined data show that 45.5% of patients recover TSH by 3 months after treatment, increasing to 69.3% by 6 months, and plateauing to 73.8% by 12 months (p>0.0001). Sub-analysis also shows that for patients who are TBII negative, 80.7% recover their TSH by 6 months compared with only 58.7% in those who are TBII positive (p= 0.003). CONCLUSION: Clinical data suggests that TSH recovery is most likely to occur within the first 6 months after treatment, with recovery plateauing at approximately 70% of patients, suggesting that reliance on this assay for monitoring can be very misleading. Furthermore, TBII positivity is associated with lower likelihood of TSH recovery. Pathophysiology behind suppressed TSH involves not only anatomical but also autoimmune mechanisms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.004
Bibliometrics0.0100.010
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.207
GPT teacher head0.429
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical and investigative medicineSame topicThyroid Disorders and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207