MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2119613713 · doi:10.1002/hyp.5776

Controls on runoff from a partially harvested aspen‐forested headwater catchment, Boreal Plain, Canada

2005· article· en· W2119613713 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueHydrological Processes · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversityUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAlberta-Pacific Forest Industries
KeywordsSurface runoffHydrology (agriculture)EvapotranspirationWater balanceEnvironmental scienceGroundwater rechargeWetlandDrainage basinPrecipitationTributarySurface waterWater storageSoil waterEphemeral keyWater tableGroundwaterGeologySoil scienceAquiferEcologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The water balance and runoff regime of a 55 ha aspen‐forested headwater catchment located on the Boreal Plain, Alberta, Canada (55·1°N, 113·8°W) were determined for 5 years following a partial timber harvest. Variability in precipitation provided the opportunity to contrast catchment water balances in relatively dry (<350 mm year −1 ), wet (>500 mm year −1 ), and average precipitation years. In most years, the catchment water balance was dominated by soil water storage, evapotranspiration losses, and vertical recharge. In 1997, despite near‐average annual precipitation (486 mm), there was significant runoff (250 mm year −1 ) with a runoff coefficient of 52%. A wet summer and autumn in the preceding year (1996) and large snow accumulation in the spring (1997) reduced the soil water storage potential, and large runoff occurred in response to a substantial July rainfall event. Maps of the surface saturated areas indicated that runoff was generated from the uplands, ephemeral draws, and valley‐bottom wetlands. Following 1997, evapotranspiration exceeded precipitation and large soil water storage potentials developed, resulting in a reduction in surface runoff to 11 mm in 1998, and <2 mm in 1999–2001. During this time, the uplands were hydrologically disconnected from ephemeral draws and valley‐bottom wetlands. Interannual variability was influenced by the degree of saturation and connectivity of ephemeral draws and valley wetlands. Variability in runoff from tributaries within the catchment was influenced by the soil water storage capacity as defined by the depth to the confining layer. An analysis of the regional water balance over the past 30 years indicated that the potential to exceed upland soil water storage capacity, to connect uplands to low‐lying areas, and to generate significant runoff may only occur about once every 20 years. The spatial and temporal variability of soil water storage capacity in relation to evaporation and precipitation deficits complicates interpretation of forest harvesting studies, and low runoff responses may mask the impacts of harvesting of aspen headwater areas on surface runoff in subhumid climates of the Boreal Plain. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.693
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it