MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2119617182 · doi:10.1037/per0000099

\nChoice impulsivity: Definitions, measurement issues, and clinical implications

2015· review· en· W2119617182 on OpenAlexaff
Kristen R. Hamilton, Marci R. Mitchell, Victoria C. Wing, Iris M. Balodis, Warren K. Bickel, Mark T. Fillmore, Scott D. Lane, Carl W. Lejuez, Andrew K. Littlefield, Maartje Luijten, Charles W. Mathias, Suzanne H. Mitchell, T. Celeste Napier, Brady Reynolds, Christian G. Schütz, Barry Setlow, Kenneth J. Sher, Alan C. Swann, Stephanie E. Tedford, Melanie J. White, Catharine A. Winstanley, Richard Yi, Marc N. Potenza, F. Gerard Moeller

Bibliographic record

VenueRadboud Repository (Radboud University) · 2015
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicConsumer Retail Behavior Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaCentre for Addiction and Mental Health
FundersNational Center for Advancing Translational SciencesNational Institute on Drug AbuseNational Institute of Mental HealthNational Institute on Alcohol Abuse and AlcoholismNational Cancer InstituteNational Institutes of HealthState of Connecticut Department of Mental Health and Addiction ServicesNational Center for Responsible Gaming
KeywordsImpulsivityPsychologyCognitive psychologyPsychotherapistClinical psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

\n Contains fulltext :\n 142484.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access)\n

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.221
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.109 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations273
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRadboud Repository (Radboud University)Same topicConsumer Retail Behavior StudiesFrench-language works237,207