Adaptive Routing for Sensor Networks using Reinforcement Learning
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Efficient and robust routing is central to wireless sensor networks (WSN) that feature energy-constrained nodes, unreliable links, and frequent topology change. While most existing routing techniques are designed to reduce routing cost by optimizing one goal, e.g., routing path length, load balance, re-transmission rate, etc, in real scenarios however, these factors affect the routing performance in a complex way, leading to the need of a more sophisticated scheme that makes correct trade-offs. In this paper, we present a novel routing scheme, AdaR that adaptively learns an optimal routing strategy, depending on multiple optimization goals. We base our approach on a least squares reinforcement learning technique, which is both data efficient, and insensitive against initial setting, thus ideal for the context of ad-hoc sensor networks. Experimental results suggest a significant performance gain over a naive Q-learning based implementation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it