MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2119744932 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2003.1226353

Creating a reusable testbench using cadence's testbuilder and AMBA TVM

2004· article· en· W2119744932 on OpenAlexaffabout
Su Xu, Hugh Pollitt-Smith

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicVLSI and Analog Circuit Testing
Canadian institutionsSTMicroelectronics (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceInterface (matter)Database transactionCadenceComputer architectureSystem on a chipEmbedded systemChipFormal verificationTransaction processingDatabaseSoftware engineeringProgramming languageOperating systemEngineeringElectronic engineeringTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a system-level verification methodology to validate complex digital intellectual property (IP) blocks. This methodology, called transaction-based verification (TBV), abstracts operations over a design-under-verification (DUV) interface from the pin-level to the transaction-level, separating the details of the interface from the generation and monitoring of data on those interfaces. This methodology is illustrated by a tutorial delivered as part of the Canadian system-on-chip research network (SOCRN) infrastructure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.717
Threshold uncertainty score0.491

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicVLSI and Analog Circuit TestingFrench-language works237,207