MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2119752083 · doi:10.3905/jwm.2013.15.4.041

Learn More About the Equal Sector Strategyof Select Sector SPDRs

2013· article· en· W2119752083 on OpenAlexaff
Alexander F. Conconi, Monica M. Demidow, Peter G. Klein, Jijun Niu

Bibliographic record

Venue˜The œjournal of wealth management · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicFinancial Markets and Investment Strategies
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPortfolioVolatility (finance)Period (music)Financial economicsEconomicsEconometricsBasis pointBusinessMonetary economicsInterest rate

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sturm [2010] find that an equally weighted portfolio of sector ETFs outperformed the S&amp;P 500 on both an absolute and risk-adjusted basis over the 2000–2007 period. State Street Global Advisors find similar results during the 2001–2010 period. The authors reconsider these fi ndings for the longer 1989–2011 period. They fi nd that an equally weighted portfolio of sector ETFs did not outperform the S&amp;P 500 over this longer period. They also find that an equally weighted portfolio of sector ETFs tends to be less volatile than the S&amp;P 500 and may outperform it on a risk-adjusted basis during periods of heightened market volatility. <b>TOPICS:</b>Exchange-traded funds and applications, performance measurement

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.691
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue˜The œjournal of wealth managementSame topicFinancial Markets and Investment StrategiesFrench-language works237,207