On signal design and detection in a multi-user channel
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Severe congestion of the communications spectrum illustrates the need to seek a communication technique that offers the potential to utilize the spectrum efficiently. Communication efficiency and multiple access capability are the two factors influencing the design of signalling systems. In this paper, a technique is proposed to address this problem. A unique continuous baseband waveform is designed for each of the many users. All users are allowed to access the channel at the same time. A waveform estimator followed by a correlator has been postulated as the detection processor. Based on such a processor, the baseband waveforms for individual users are found by maximizing the correlator's output signal-to-noise ratio, subject to the constraint of a finite bandwidth. The resulting waveforms are linear combinations of sinusoids or of prolate spheroidal functions, depending on whether the r.m.s. or the Slepian [1] definition of bandwidth is used. The use of unique continuous baseband waveforms for the individual users avoids the use of rectangular code sequences which spreads the spectrum in conventional code division multiple-access systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it