Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT This paper examines the discovery process in terms of changing exploration paradigms and describes a field discovered because of this change in mindset. Prior to the Umiak discovery all wells in the Mackenzie Delta had been drilled on structural highs. Reevaluation of two 30-yr-old dry holes along with existing two-dimensional (2-D) seismic data resulted in discovery of the Umiak gas field. This reappraisal led to recognition that a stratigraphic trap might exist between these two wells drilled in the early 1970s. The Kilagmiotak M-16 well contained 290 m (951 ft) of porous sandstone in the Eocene Taglu Formation, whereas the Umiak J-37 well, up dip and 11 km (6.8 mi) to the west, had no sandstone in the same interval. Examination of 2-D seismic lines found evidence of an updip sandstone pinchout beneath an angular unconformity on a tilted fault block. Strata in the tilted fault block below the unconformity contain strong amplitudes and flat spots. Interpretation of a subsequent three-dimensional (3-D) survey supported the play. A partnership of Alberta Energy Company (operator, now Encana), Anadarko, and Gulf Canada (now ConocoPhillips Canada) drilled the Umiak N-16 discovery well during 2004. Gas and some oil was found in gently dipping Eocene Taglu shoreface and delta front sandstones, and within gently folded foreset beds of the Eocene Richards Formation above a mid-Eocene unconformity. The Umiak N-05 appraisal well drilled a year later confirmed the discovery. Together these two wells delineate the fourth largest onshore gas accumulation on the Mackenzie Delta.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.033 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".