MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2119763244 · doi:10.1109/twc.2010.02.090065

Rectangular information lossless linear dispersion codes

2010· article· en· W2119763244 on OpenAlexaff
Jinsong Wu, Steven D. Blostein

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Communication Techniques
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFadingBlock codeMathematicsOrthonormal basisTelecommunicationsCombinatoricsDiscrete mathematicsAlgorithmComputer scienceTopology (electrical circuits)Decoding methodsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper extends square M×M linear dispersion codes (LDC) proposed by Hassibi and Hochwald to T×M non-square linear dispersion codes of the same rate M, termed uniform LDC, or U-LDC. This paper establishes a unitary property of arbitrary rectangular U-LDC encoding matrices and determines their connection to the traceless minimal nonorthogonality criterion for space-time codes. The U-LDC are then applied to rapid fading channels by constructing trace-orthonormal versions, or TON-U-LDC for 2L and 4L input symbols, where L is a positive integer. Compared to a variety of state-of-the-art codes, the proposed codes are found to perform well in both block and rapid fading channels. In rapid fading, the symbol-wise time diversity order of a T × M, TON-U-LDC for 2L input symbols is shown to be min (T,2M).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Wireless CommunicationsSame topicAdvanced Wireless Communication TechniquesFrench-language works237,207