Panniculectomy: an alternative approach to the revision of a difficult stoma
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AIM: We describe a modified abdominoplasty technique as an alternative approach to the revision of a difficult stoma. METHOD: A patient with a retracted colostomy secondary to change in abdominal wall contour following significant weight loss was treated with this technique. The patient had previous colostomy revision with marlex mesh insertion for combined parastomal and massive ventral hernia repair. A preoperatively marked crescent shaped left upper quadrant segment of skin and subcutaneous fat was excised and the defect was approximated in multiple layers. This shifted the stoma opening cephalad and eliminated the cutaneous crease that originally made it difficult to obtain a proper stoma seal. RESULTS: At one year follow up the patient was extremely satisfied with the results and was able to properly pouch the stoma. CONCLUSION: Modified abdominoplasty can be used as an alternative, low morbid approach in dealing with selected patients with difficult stoma problems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it