MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2119781685 · doi:10.1139/w03-080

Methanotrophic diversity in high arctic wetlands on the islands of Svalbard (Norway) - denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis of soil DNA and enrichment cultures

2003· article· en· W2119781685 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ingvild Wartiainen, Anne Grethe Hestnes, Mette M. Svenning

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Microbiology · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMicrobial metabolism and enzyme function
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTemperature gradient gel electrophoresisTundraArcticPermafrostMethaneEnvironmental chemistryBiologyEcology16S ribosomal RNAChemistryBacteriaGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The methanotrophic community in arctic soil from the islands of Svalbard, Norway (78 degrees N) was analysed by combining group-specific PCR with PCR of the highly variable V3 region of the 16S rRNA gene and then by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE). Selected bands were sequenced for identification. The analyses were performed with DNA extracted directly from soil and from enrichment cultures at 10 and 20 degrees C. The two genera Methylobacter and Methylosinus were found in all localities studied. The DGGE band patterns were simple, and DNA fragments with single base differences were separated. The arctic tundra is a potential source of extensive methane emission due to climatic warming because of its large reservoirs of stored organic carbon. Higher temperatures due to climatic warming can cause increased methane production, and the abundance and activity of methane-oxidizing bacteria in the arctic soil may be important regulators for methane emission to the atmosphere.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.099
Threshold uncertainty score0.197

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations64
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of MicrobiologySame topicMicrobial metabolism and enzyme functionFrench-language works237,207