Effects of five consecutive nocturnal hypoxic exposures on the cerebrovascular responses to acute hypoxia and hypercapnia in humans
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The effects of discontinuous hypoxia on cerebrovascular regulation in humans are unknown. We hypothesized that five nocturnal hypoxic exposures (8 h/day) at a simulated altitude of 4,300 m (inspired O2 fraction = approximately 13.8%) would elicit cerebrovascular responses that are similar to those that have been reported during chronic altitude exposures. Twelve male subjects (26.6 +/- 4.1 yr, mean +/- SD) volunteered for this study. The technique of end-tidal forcing was used to examine cerebral blood flow (CBF) and regional cerebral O2 saturation (Sr(O2)) responses to acute variations in O2 and CO2 twice before, immediately after, and 5 days after the overnight hypoxic exposures. Transcranial Doppler ultrasound was used to assess CBF, and near-infrared spectroscopy was used to assess Sr(O2). Throughout the nocturnal hypoxic exposures, end-tidal Pco2 decreased (P < 0.001) whereas arterial O2 saturation increased (P < 0.001) compared with overnight normoxic control measurements. Symptoms associated with altitude illness were significantly greater than control values on the first night (P < 0.001) and second night (P < 0.01) of nocturnal hypoxia. Immediately after the nocturnal hypoxic intervention, the sensitivity of CBF to acute variations in O2 and CO2 increased 116% (P < 0.01) and 33% (P < 0.05), respectively, compared with control values. Sr(O2) was highly correlated with arterial O2 saturation (R2 = 0.94 +/- 0.04). These results show that discontinuous hypoxia elicits increases in the sensitivity of CBF to acute variations in O2 and CO2, which are similar to those observed during chronic hypoxia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".