MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2119799211 · doi:10.2514/1.j053654

Local Reduced-Order Modeling and Iterative Sampling for Parametric Analyses of Aero-Icing Problems

2015· article· en· W2119799211 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueAIAA Journal · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicModel Reduction and Neural Networks
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersCompute CanadaUniversité du Québec à MontréalNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMcGill University
KeywordsIcingNonlinear systemParametric statisticsSampling (signal processing)Basis (linear algebra)Computer scienceMathematical optimizationMachine learningArtificial intelligenceAlgorithmMathematicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A framework of local reduced-order modeling using machine learning algorithms is presented together with an approach to optimally select the snapshots for strongly nonlinear problems. By using an unsupervised learning algorithm, solutions are grouped into clusters of similar features. The input parameter space is divided into subregions by decision boundaries based on a supervised learning algorithm. Local reduced-order bases are extracted on each cluster, for which the solutions are represented as a linear combination of the basis vectors from their corresponding subregion. The proposed methodology is employed to conduct a comprehensive, exploration of the in-flight icing certification envelopes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.634
Threshold uncertainty score0.338

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.170
GPT teacher head0.373
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it