MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2119818928 · doi:10.1190/1.1543212

Least-squares wave-equation migration for AVP/AVA inversion

2003· article· en· W2119818928 on OpenAlexaff
Henning Kühl, Mauricio D. Sacchi

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysics · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSeismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClassification of discontinuitiesInversion (geology)AmplitudeSmoothingSeismic migrationAcoustic wave equationSynthetic dataAlgorithmWave equationLeast-squares function approximationMathematical analysisMathematicsGeologyOpticsWave propagationPhysicsGeophysicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We present an acoustic migration/inversion algorithm that uses extended double-square-root wave-equation migration and modeling operators to minimize a constrained least-squares data misfit function (least-squares migration). We employ an imaging principle that allows for the extraction of ray-parameter-domain common image gathers (CIGs) from the propagated seismic wavefield. The CIGs exhibit amplitude variations as a function of half-offset ray parameter (AVP) closely related to the amplitude variation with reflection angle (AVA). Our least-squares wave-equation migration/inversion is constrained by a smoothing regularization along the ray parameter. This approach is based on the idea that rapid amplitude changes or discontinuities along the ray parameter axis result from noise, incomplete wavefield sampling, and numerical operator artifacts. These discontinuities should therefore be penalized in the inversion. The performance of the proposed algorithm is examined with two synthetic examples. In the first case, we generated acoustic finite difference data for a horizontally layered model. The AVP functions based on the migrated/inverted ray parameter CIGs were converted to AVA plots. The AVA plots were then compared to the true acoustic AVA of the reflectors. The constrained least-squares inversion compares favorably with the conventional migration, especially when incompleteness compromises the data. In the second example, we use the Marmousi data set to test the algorithm in complex media. The result shows that least-squares migration can mitigate kinematic artifacts in the ray-parameter domain CIGs effectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations226
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysicsSame topicSeismic Imaging and Inversion TechniquesFrench-language works237,207