Segurança humana : avanços e desafios na política internacional
Bibliographic record
Abstract
O conceito de Seguranca Humana surge na decada de 1990 como uma alternativa ao tradicional conceito de seguranca centrado no Estado. Para ativistas e intelectuais ligados aos novos debates sobre o conceito, e necessario que as politicas de seguranca se centrem nos individuos, resguardando os seus direitos, tanto por meio de politicas de desenvolvimento, como pela protecao de possiveis violencias fisicas. Com base nisto, este trabalho destacara a Seguranca humana, especialmente, a proposta feita pelo Programa das Nacoes Unidas para o Desenvolvimento (PNUD). O objetivo do texto e apresentar uma analise critica do conceito de Seguranca humana, sua formulacao, os seus debates e criticas. Alem disso, serao apresentadas duas politicas internacionais se fundamentam no conceito de Seguranca humana: o Fundo Fiduciario de Seguranca Humana, encabecado pelo Japao, e a Rede de Seguranca Humana, liderada pelo Canada Abstract
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.027 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".