MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2119844712 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2006.277614

An Open Simulator Architecture for Heterogeneous Self-Organizing Networks

2006· article· en· W2119844712 on OpenAlexaff
Desanka Polajnar, Jernej Polajnar

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEnergy Efficient Wireless Sensor Networks
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Northern British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceInitializationNode (physics)Software deploymentDistributed computingHeterogeneous networkWireless sensor networkVariety (cybernetics)ArchitectureWireless networkNetwork architectureNetwork simulationWirelessComputer networkComputer architectureSoftware engineeringArtificial intelligenceEngineeringTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the maturing of research in wireless sensor networks (WSN) and the more recent advances in wireless sensor and actor networks (WSAN), there has been an increasing interest in heterogeneous self-organizing networks with multiple types of nodes that possess different capabilities and perform diverse tasks in the network's deployment, maintenance, and application functionalities. This paper explores the conceptual and architectural challenges in the design of generic tools for modeling and simulation of such systems. It first addresses the modeling issues, including the diversity of node types and capabilities, the variety of possible abstractions, and the need for vertical cross-layer integration. After a brief review of the solutions in some existing simulation systems, the paper outlines an open architectural platform incorporating the facilities for: definition of potential capabilities of network elements; formation of node types with selected capabilities and behavioral algorithms; formation of relevant environment models; configuration and initialization of the network and its environment; and scenario definition, execution and monitoring

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.706
Threshold uncertainty score0.902

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEnergy Efficient Wireless Sensor NetworksFrench-language works237,207