MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2119845811 · doi:10.2113/jeeg18.1.27

Mapping Degrading Hydrocarbon Plumes with Self Potentials: Investigation on Causative Mechanisms using Field and Modeling Data

2013· article· en· W2119845811 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPlumeTransition zoneDiffusionEnvironmental scienceRange (aeronautics)GeologySoil scienceGeophysicsMaterials scienceMeteorologyPhysicsThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Organic contaminants in ground water, such as those in landfill leachate or hydrocarbon spills, are of concern when they impact drinking water. Self potentials have been proposed as a rapid, simple and inexpensive method for mapping a plume from the ground surface as it is hypothesized they may be sensitive to gradients in the redox potential that develop around such plumes in some cases. We conducted self potential and resistivity surveys on two sites with hydrocarbon contaminant plumes in ground water and did not find a correlation between redox and self potentials, even after the electrical measurements were corrected for anthropogenic noise. To further explore the relationship between contaminant plumes and self potentials, we undertook modeling based on coupled fluxes. We used a finite element code and, as input, simulation results from a kinetic reactive transport model of a hypothetical hydrocarbon spill. Two types of source currents were tested. The first type is sources caused by diffusion, modeled using the Nernst-Plank equation. The diffusion model does not produce anomalies at the ground surface greater than 2 mV, which would be in the range of measurement error and within normal background variations in the field. The second type is sources caused by redox potential gradients, using an equation that assumes a transition zone where charge transfer is through a hypothetical electronic conductor, perhaps microbial nanowires or bioprecipitated minerals. For the case of the electronic conductor transition zone, the strength of the surface SP signal is affected by the electrical conductivity of the transition zone. The only scenarios that produced measureable self potential anomalies at the ground surface were those using the redox hypothesis with a transition zone that did not have very large electrical conductivity compared to background and strong Eh gradients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.566
Threshold uncertainty score0.355

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.164 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it