MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2119851472 · doi:10.4000/books.irdeditions.218

Les bienfaits du crime : de la légalité illégale à la subversion de la société civile

2009· book-chapter· fr· W2119851472 on OpenAlexaff
Guilhem Fabre

Bibliographic record

VenueIRD Éditions eBooks · 2009
Typebook-chapter
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Canadian institutionsMusée de la Civilisation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

« Je hais les criminels qui s’appuient sur les lois. » Cette phrase du surréaliste belge Louis Scutenaire me vient à l’esprit quand il s’agit d’évoquer les travaux de Christian Geffray sur un sujet aussi grave que le trafic de drogue et le crime organisé. Car c’est bien de l’institutionnalisation du crime dont il est question, de cette inhumanité programmée dont l’holocauste nazi et les camps staliniens sont les images exacerbées. Je parle ici volontairement des camps, car la lecture de l’Ess...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.074
Threshold uncertainty score0.146

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0090.026
Scholarly communication0.0060.004
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.372
Teacher spread0.337 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIRD Éditions eBooksSame topicPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology ResearchFrench-language works237,207