MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2119907069 · doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2007.12.009

Structural Variation of Chromosomes in Autism Spectrum Disorder

2008· article· en· W2119907069 on OpenAlexaff
Christian R. Marshall, Abdul Noor, John B. Vincent, Anath C. Lionel, Lars Feuk, Jennifer Skaug, Mary Shago, Rainald Moessner, Dalila Pinto, Yan Ren, Bhooma Thiruvahindrapduram, Andreas Fiebig, Stefan Schreiber, Jan M. Friedman, Cees Ketelaars, Yvonne J. Vos, Can Fıçıcıoğlu, Susan J. Kirkpatrick, Rob Nicolson, Leon Sloman, Anne Summers, Clare Gibbons, Ahmad S. Teebi, David Chitayat, Rosanna Weksberg, Ann Thompson, Cathy Vardy, Vicki Crosbie, Sandra Luscombe, Rebecca Baatjes, Lonnie Zwaigenbaum, Wendy Roberts, Bridget A. Fernandez, Péter Szatmári, Stephen W. Scherer

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Journal of Human Genetics · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
Canadian institutionsHolland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation HospitalUniversity of AlbertaMcMaster UniversityNorth York General HospitalWestern UniversityHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of British ColumbiaMemorial University of NewfoundlandCentre for Addiction and Mental HealthSickKids FoundationUniversity of Toronto
FundersAutism Speaks
KeywordsCopy-number variationGeneticsAutism spectrum disorderGene duplicationBiologyStructural variationAutismMicroarraySegmental duplicationGene dosageSingle-nucleotide polymorphismGeneGenomeGenotypeMedicineGene familyPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1,843
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueThe American Journal of Human GeneticsSame topicGenomic variations and chromosomal abnormalitiesFrench-language works237,207