'Tear Down These Walls': Economic Globalisation and the Future of Interstate War
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The past 70 years have witnessed unbroken interstate peace between great powers and an immense increase in international economic activity. The relationship between these two developments, and the wider relationship between economic activity and peace between states, has been a subject of immense inquiry in international relations. In attempting to discern a causal link in this area, this essay will ask “does increased international economic activity, namely trade and foreign investment, reduce the likelihood of interstate war? ” This question is vital to political scientists and historians concerned with the neoliberal state organisation and what it reveals about the nature of states and the system they comprise. It is also important to the general audience; an answer to this question could reveal whether the system it participates in is nurturing a liberal peace or summoning an age of war. In answering this question, it is necessary to establish definitional parameters. According to Evans and Newnham (1990: 374-5), the state “is the main actor in world politics. […] states must possess […] a permanent population, a defined territory and a government capable of maintaining effective control over its territory and of conducting
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.026 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.012 | 0.010 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".