MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2119940375 · doi:10.1109/icc.2007.360

Optical Impulse Modulation for Diffuse Indoor Wireless Optical Channels

2007· article· en· W2119940375 on OpenAlexaff
Mahmoud Mohamed, Steve Hranilovic

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Wireless Communication Technologies
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransmitterComputer scienceMultipath propagationOptical wirelessChannel (broadcasting)Optical modulation amplitudeImpulse (physics)Bandwidth (computing)Pulse-amplitude modulationWirelessElectronic engineeringTelecommunicationsPhysicsLaserOpticsPulse (music)EngineeringOptical amplifier

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Power efficient signaling over indoor diffuse wireless optical channels is considered. Present-day laser diodes have pulse rates many times higher than the bandwidth of multipath distorted diffuse channels. Despite the fact that the transmitter extra degrees of freedom are not supported by the low-pass channel, they can be used to satisfy the channel non-negativity constraint. In this paper, we define optical impulse modulation (OIM) in which data are confined to the low-pass region while the high-pass region, which is distorted by the channel, is used to satisfy the channel amplitude constraints. A mathematical framework for OIM is presented, and an optimal receiver filter is designed. At a normalized delay spread of 0.2, the gain in average optical power of using decision feedback equalization (DFE) with rectangular pulse-amplitude modulation (PAM) is 4.8 dBo, while that of using the less complex unequalized OIM receiver is shown to be 4.9 dBo.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.687
Threshold uncertainty score0.714

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOptical Wireless Communication TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207