MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2119978482 · doi:10.1109/icdcsw.2003.1203667

Optimal and near optimal web proxy placement algorithms for networks with planar graph topologies

2004· article· en· W2119978482 on OpenAlexaff
A.-E.M. Taha, Ahmed E. Kamal

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCaching and Content Delivery
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceNetwork topologyTopology (electrical circuits)AlgorithmGraphCachePlanar graphPlanarMinimaxDistributed computingComputer networkTheoretical computer scienceMathematical optimizationMathematicsCombinatorics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper investigates the placement of a finite set of web cache proxies in a computer network with a planar graph topology, based on a dynamic programming approach. Three criteria are defined for the web proxy placement: 1) the min-sum strategy with consolidated request forwarding (MS-CRF); 2) the min-sum criterion with immediate request forwarding (MS-IRF); and 3) the minmax with immediate request forwarding (MM-IRF). Optimal placement is obtained under MS-CRF. Under the MS-IRF and MM-IRF, a near optimal placement is achieved. This can be improved through a refinement strategy. The paper deals with the cylindrical mesh topology as a general topology on which any planar graph can be embedded.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.427
Threshold uncertainty score0.453

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCaching and Content DeliveryFrench-language works237,207